Hillary Clinton and the News Media – Reblogged from Abagond’s Blog

Posted: November 6, 2016 in Uncategorized

Abagond’s latest blogpost is worth sharing here. Ironically, he still seems to prefer Hillary to Trump.

I will leave it to all to draw your own conclusions regarding what I consider the HIGHLY BIASED NATURE, pro-Clinton media coverage of this presidential election.

It is also up to you to decide WHOSE INTERESTS a Hillary Clinton presidency really represents.

Unless you belong to the white ONE PERCENT, I am hard-pressed to understand how anyone could think she will serve theirs.

As a prelude to his post, I thought the information below was a useful addition:

This infographic below created by Jason at Frugal Dad shows that almost all media comes from the same six sources.

That’s consolidated from 50 companies back in 1983.

By 1992 that number had dropped by half. By 2000, six corporations had ownership of most media, and today five dominate the industry: Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch’s News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany and Viacom.

media-infographic

(Abagond’s Plog Post)

Hillary Clinton and the news media

clinton-propped-nrd-990

 

Some of what we know about Hillary Clinton’s relationship with the press. It goes way beyond (not) answering their questions:

  • maria-cardonaPaid shills (what the media calls “a supporter of Hillary Clinton” or “Democratic strategist”):
    • Stephanie Cutter: NBC, ABC, CNN
    • Maria Cardona: CNN
    • Hari Sevugan: CBS, MSNBC
    • Lynda Tran: CBS, MSNBC
  • clinton-foundationClinton Foundation donors to her “pay to play” charity:
    • AOL: owns of Huffington Post
    • Bloomberg
    • Comcast: owns NBC, MSNBC
    • George Stephanopoulos of ABC News
    • Google
    • Hearst Corporation: owns King Features Syndicate, San Francisco Chronicle, Houston Chronicle, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Esquire, Harper’s Bazaar, Good Housekeeping and other magazines and newspapers.
    • Howard Stringer of CBS News
    • James Murdoch of News Corp, which owns Fox News
    • PBS
    • Public Radio International
    • Reuters
    • Time Warner: owns CNN, HBO, etc
    • Twitter
    • Viacom
    • Washington Post Company: owns the Washington Post

Clinton campaign donors:

  • CBS Television
  • Comcast, owner of NBC News, MSNBC
  • News Corp, owner of Fox News
  • Time Warner, owner of CNN
  • Walt Disney, owner of ABC

To the read the rest of his blogpost click here:

Comments
  1. Mariama says:

    @Pam

    This is very interesting. I like how they use so-called big words and titles to cover up what they are really doing (e.g: strategist, lobbyist, etc). For those who don’t know, it would be very easy to get food by this (I used to be one of them, and at times, I still have to catch myself). It seems as if Hillary has got the whole media behind her. The more and more I found out about her, the more I feel that she is Satan hiding behind a dress..

    • Trojan Pam says:

      @ Mariama

      Actually, at the risk of seeming too far out,

      check out this link:

      http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/wikileaks-podesta-practices-occult-magic/

      keep in mind he the campaign chairman

      • Mariama says:

        @Pam

        Thank you. I will check this out. And just to mention, this election business is some serious business. People really don’t understand or see Hillary for who she is. My father has a Phd in Political Science and he is voting for her. Months ago, I mentioned to him Hillary’s comment about super predators (her reference to young black men and women) and he actually agreed. Needless to say, I was very disappointed with his response. This shows that a college degree does not always substitute real knowledge and understanding. After that, I mentioned the email scandals, and he said that was just the Republicans way of sabotaging her. This morning he asked me if I was going to vote and I told him that I didn’t want any parts of it. I could tell that he was disappointed, but he didn’t say anything to me after that. This is a man who is highly intelligent and someone that I love and respect but he has never mentioned anything that we talk about on this blog. Not the emails, Haiti rip off, racist comments, her love and support of all things Margaret Sanger, nothing. Sometimes I just wonder if we are on another planet.

  2. Timothy says:

    @Sister Trojan Pam

    The media monopoly in the mainstream level has existed for decades. This excellent article once again proves that the political establishment is not out for the interests of the people. They are out for the interests of the one percent and many big multinational corporations (who have more power than many small nations). Hillary Clinton being supported by many media figures has been proven as many media hosts have overt ties to the Clinton campaign like David Gregory. We have to use our minds to get beyond the spin shown by the mainstream media and figure out comprehensively the truth. Hillary Clinton’s links to the exploitation of the Haitians, the Clinton Foundation, and other bad agendas are fully shown in the Internet, books, and other resources. If a person calls our black youth “super predators” and tell Africans to get over what happened to them 100 years ago, then that person shouldn’t be respected by us. It is just that apparently clear. Great Article Sister.

    • Trojan Pam says:

      @ Timothy

      The reason for my last five posts was to tear the sheepskin off our eyes. Hillary is puppet of the white supremacist one percent.

      We ignore that FACT at our own peril. This is NOT about Trump. This is about NOT voting for someone who is so dangerous that even the FBI can’t touch her. Someone that the leader of Russia, Putin, is certain will be the most likely president to start a thermo-nuclear war.

      She is the one who instituted a no-fly zone in Syria (which the US has NO RIGHT to do in a sovereign nation), clearly provoking Russia into action. It’s like someone coming into your relative’s house and drawing a line on the rug and saying if you step over that line they have the right to attack you.

      Attack you in someone else’s home?????

      And to make matters worse, you are visiting and have to cross that line to get out the front door and go home. It’s a no-win for you BUT it’s clear the MANIAC who draws a line in someone else’s house is looking for a FIGHT.

      This level of insanity is what people are voting for. I know it’s not an easy decision, but let’s not blind ourselves with all the anti-Trump RHETORIC designed to push us in the opposite direction

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s